|

Darkseeker
|
Heyo, a friend pointed out that two wolves i got are IB
But they have so many benefits that personally i dont care, each 300 talents and DH HW
If i finish training them to DG, will everyone here care about IB (inbreeding). For any new players, it has no affect on wolves and is just something some players worry about
Really i know some will, just curious on how many so i know how many to train and sell. and how many to keep for myself Poll Question: yes no maybe so?Total Votes: 15
yes : | 3 | 20% | | no : | 11 | 73% | | Maybe/Depends on other factors (please comment what^^) : | 1 | 7% | | You have cast your vote.
|
|  |
|
|

Neutral
|
I like the challenge of clean lined breeding, but it's more of just that-- an additional challenge I do for fun. I do think they're more valuable often times because they are harder to accomplish and still have good stat wolves. That said, when it comes to explore, inbreeding really doesn't matter. I have CL and IB wolves on my explore teams, I just use whoever's best to get the job done. Not all my explore wolves are even wolves I use for breeding.
|
|  |
|
|

Darkseeker
|
If you're referring to these one and two wovles they would both be CL, but if bred together would have IB pups. Personally I like short gen wolves purley because that is my preference. I'd take a low stat CL wolf over a high talent IB wolf. I can always slap on CP and train as needed, talents and heritage (other then weight and vitals, in my opinion) have no effect on how good a wolf is for explore. Also I use my battlers as breeders too, and it's annoying to keep track of heritage so it's better that none of my wolves are related. Edited at August 14, 2025 03:15 AM by Eno
|
|  |
|
|

Neutral
|
Objectively and functionally, makes no difference. My podium hunters were IB to hell, I dragged them out of Trading Post and made them into stars. Subjectively, biology programming says ew in some people The market for explore wolves has been booty in general, especially with all the high talent wolves, so more people may care about the IB part since they aren't exploring hardcore Edited at August 14, 2025 04:46 AM by Enigma
|
|
|
|

Darkseeker
|
yes those two I mean :)
Im trying to gather more DH HW high talent wolves, so i can avoid IB. but i dont want to have to focus on that so much, hence the poll^^
Ok yeah the short gen is for me really too much to pay attention, but thank you for the reply, will keep in mind Eno said: If you're referring to these one and two wovles they would both be CL, but if bred together would have IB pups. Personally I like short gen wolves purley because that is my preference. I'd take a low stat CL wolf over a high talent IB wolf. I can always slap on CP and train as needed, talents and heritage (other then weight and vitals, in my opinion) have no effect on how good a wolf is for explore. Also I use my battlers as breeders too, and it's annoying to keep track of heritage so it's better that none of my wolves are related.
Edited at August 14, 2025 04:00 AM by CriesInTheNight
|
|  |
|
|

Darkseeker
|
IB literally affects nothing in game, so why care? If it's CL but sucks overall with my other important factors, I'm going to retire it and keep the IB with high talents, HW and high vitals. I used to care but then I realized hey, IB high talents with other high talents could totally save me from spending a butt load of mush on CP, so why not?
|
|
|
|

Darkseeker
|
yes exactly thank you! Spotlight Tango said: IB literally affects nothing in game, so why care? If it's CL but sucks overall with my other important factors, I'm going to retire it and keep the IB with high talents, HW and high vitals. I used to care but then I realized hey, IB high talents with other high talents could totally save me from spending a butt load of mush on CP, so why not?
|
|  |
|
|

Neutral
|
Honestly I really don't care about wolves being IB, except when theyre on the market I can get them for cheaper lmao
|
|
|
|

Lightbringer
|
For explore wolves i never care about inbreeding. If they hit hard nothing else matters
|
|  |
|