| |
Administrator
Lightbringer
|
We would like to optimize the new Dominance Staggering (Wolf Totem) feature so you don't loose your dominance, but still have it staggered as best it can. Would you prefer if the script excludes dominance of 200+? Total Votes: 166
| Yes : | 115 | 69% | | | No : | 4 | 2% | | | I have another idea (Describe) : | 0 | 0% | | | I don't use this feature. : | 47 | 28% | | You have cast your vote. |
|
|
| |
Lightbringer
|
I used the totem today and before I used it I had 7.8k dom and after using it I now have 18k While thats a nice boost its not entirely fair to everyone thats already spent thousands on dominance, I see this feature being more fair if it staggers your already existing dominance Edit: Another feature could be you can choose how it staggers dominance, Ex. Youngest to Oldest |
|  |
|
| |
Lightbringer
|
Another suggestion: Itd work similar to how you can set wolves as explore wolves, a little toggle (or whatever its called) giving you the option to have wolves affected by the stagger dominance or not Dominance available to stagger would only be drawn from the wolves set to be available to stagger (so similar to whats suggested in the poll) Ex. Available for dominance stagger (yes/no) Ex. Total Dominance: 10k Dominance Available to Stagger: 5.6k |
| |
|
| |
Neutral
|
More suggestions: - Option to select "Stagger in Existing Order" which would stagger the wolves in the order they're already displayed in.
- Option to choose the intervals the wolves are staggered in, so for example with a gap of 1, 2, 5, or 10 dominance points in between each wolf
A comment on "free" dominance: while packs in the past spent a lot on dominance, I think with the exclusion of 200+ dom wolves this won't change much. It will however decrease how much you are restricted by your financial status, and become more dependent on how many wolves you have in your pack, which makes sense realistically (more dominant packs would be larger in size). |
|
|
| |
Darkseeker
|
I had used the staggering tool and lost over 1k Dominance but I still had wolves that don't have Dominance. Idk where it went or why it deleted it 😕 |
|  |
|
| |
Lightbringer
|
I like the idea of a toggle, above, as you could then decide to have ten wolves with higher dominance that wouldn't be lost when you stagger the rest. I also lost a lot of dominance when I tried the tool as I hadn't expected it to stagger by five points, perhaps two might be better so it leaves a gap to insert a wolf if changing the order but doesn't mean that the lowest wolves have very little (or no) dominance. |
|
|
Spring 
Day Weather: 
Flood
