| |
Neutral
|
So I bought this girl, and she was a Lecusm. Now it's saying she's not a defect at all? And i know she indeed was a defect cause of this forum. And i did not remove her defect cause i have NO apples what so ever. |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
my guy, she's not a leucism. there's nowhere it said she was a leucism in that forum, she just has the egg nog coat |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
banshee. said:
my guy, she's not a leucism. there's nowhere it said she was a leucism in that forum, she just has the egg nog coat
No, you can ask the person i bought her from she was a Lecusm, i doubled checked and everything. I bought her from Holly, who stated (i checked) was a Lecusm. |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
she was never a leucism. this is what a leucism looks like in alpha female, they have a white face. all leucism wolves look the same no matter what  and this is the wolf you bought. maybe both you and the breeder were mistaken, but she's not a leucism. you have to double check on her wolf page as well, which was not linked.  |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
banshee. said:
she was never a leucism. this is what a leucism looks like in alpha female, they have a white face. all leucism wolves look the same no matter what and this is the wolf you bought. maybe both you and the breeder were mistaken, but she's not a leucism. you have to double check on her wolf page as well, which was not linked.
I contacted the owner, and they'll say the same thing. I swear to god I DID NOT remove the defect! |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
the owner was then mistaken. this wolf - a picture taken from the ORIGINAL poll, clearly has okapi leg stripes, which would be invisible on a leuc.
this wolf was never a leuc, both the owner and you were mistaken. i'm not doubting your side of the story |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
Checking on the wolf's page, it is clearly seen that Shell, the egg-coated wolf, is not a leucistic wolf. She is an egg-coated wolf which could, at a quick glance, could be mistaken for leucism.
As for you removing the defect, without the use of the apple item, Ethereal Tears, this is impossible. A screenshot from before you bought the wolf shows she not a leucism then either.
In actuality, she was never a leucism wolf at all.
|
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
banshee. said:
the owner was then mistaken. this wolf - a picture taken from the ORIGINAL poll, clearly has okapi leg stripes, which would be invisible on a leuc.
this wolf was never a leuc, both the owner and you were mistaken. i'm not doubting your side of the story
She was a Lecusm and i know it, I know about this game. I would know if it was a Lecusm or not. Her defect was otherwise removed from thr game by mistake, or its a giant glitch. Cause i know she was |
|
|
| |
Neutral
|
bro. my GUY. a leucism does NOT have these stripes on the legs, and that's a screenshot taken from the original thread. defects cannot be removed like this. also, it's leucism, not lecusm, leading me to believe maybe you don't know these defects as well as you think.  those are the stripes i'm talking about. |
|
|
| |
Game Moderator
Neutral
|
As this is not a bug, I'll be moving this out of bugs.
the picture of this wolf on the poll is nor ever was a leucism. A hard copy/screenshot of the wolf's image, from before you bought the wolf, proves this. The image itself is what the wolf always was.
Also defects can't just vanish unless you OR the wolf's previous owner removed the defect with the apple item. It's not possible for a defected wolf to loose it's defect otherwise and there's no bug or glitch that could have caused something like you're saying happened |
|  |
|
Spring Month: 1 
Day 
Flood